Tenders in Orlando
Last inspected:
12226 Corporate Blvd #166, Orlando, FL 32817Tenders in Orlando has accumulated 368 violations across 39 inspections since 2016, averaging 9.4 per visit. The facility has faced 5 disciplinary actions totaling $1,900 in fines. Fire safety records document flammable materials stored near ignition sources, specifically unsealed plywood with fire damage placed over a range to hold a gyro cooker, a hazard cited in 2017 that required extended time to resolve. Recurring violations center on proper ventilation, food contact surfaces, and adequate lighting.
Summary generated from Florida DBPR public inspection records. This facility has an active inspection record with the Florida DBPR.
Tenders in Orlando: Comparison to Orange County Averages
This Facility
9.5
violations / inspection
9.5 violations per inspection
Orange County Avg
5.93
violations / inspection
5.93 county average
This Facility
0
emergency closures
0 closures
Orange County Avg
0.13
closures / facility
0.13 county average
Tenders in Orlando: Fines & Disciplinary Actions (5)
Total fines on record: $1,900.00
| Action Date | Case Number | Fine | Violation Date | Enforcement Office |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4--2025068724 | $400.00 | Jul 8, 2025 | Miami (Doral) | |
| 4--2020049479 | $600.00 | Oct 1, 2020 | Miami (Doral) | |
| 4--2018051232 | $400.00 | Jul 31, 2018 | Miami (Doral) | |
| 4--2017030066 | $300.00 | May 18, 2017 | Miami (Doral) | |
| 4--2015038936 | $200.00 | Jul 2, 2015 | Miami (Doral) |
Tenders in Orlando: Fire Safety & Life Safety Violations (2)
— 2 fire violations
— Routine - Food · 49-05-4 · Call Back - Complied
Inspector Observation: - From initial inspection : Flammables stored near a source of ignition. For reporting purposes only. A sheet of ply wood has been placed over the range to hold the gyro cooker. The plywood is unsealed and shows fire damage from where the pilot is. This needs to be removed - From follow-up inspection 2017-11-29: **Time Extended**
Legal Basis: Reporting: (d) The division, or its agent, shall notify the local firesafety authority or the State Fire Marshal of any readily observable violation of a rule adopted under chapter 633 which relates to public lodging establishments or public food establishments, and the identification of such violation does not require any firesafety inspection certification. For reporting purposes only.
— Routine - Food · 49-05-4 · Warning Issued
Inspector Observation: Flammables stored near a source of ignition. For reporting purposes only. A sheet of ply wood has been placed over the range to hold the gyro cooker. The plywood is unsealed and shows fire damage from where the pilot is. This needs to be removed
Legal Basis: Reporting: (d) The division, or its agent, shall notify the local firesafety authority or the State Fire Marshal of any readily observable violation of a rule adopted under chapter 633 which relates to public lodging establishments or public food establishments, and the identification of such violation does not require any firesafety inspection certification. For reporting purposes only.
Tenders in Orlando: Full Inspection History — DBPR (40)
— 1 inspection10 violations · 5 high priority
— Routine - Food· 10 violations (5 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 4 inspections21 violations · 14 high priority
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (2 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 9 violations (6 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 3 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
— 2 inspections17 violations · 10 high priority
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (3 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 11 violations (7 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 3 inspections27 violations · 14 high priority
— Complaint Full· 12 violations (6 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (2 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 11 violations (6 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 4 inspections44 violations · 20 high priority
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (4 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 14 violations (7 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 11 violations (4 high priority)· Call Back - Admin. complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 13 violations (5 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 4 inspections34 violations · 19 high priority
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (2 high priority)· Call Back - Admin. complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 10 violations (5 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 11 violations (6 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (6 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 2 inspections19 violations · 10 high priority
— Routine - Food· 9 violations (5 high priority)· Call Back - Admin. complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 10 violations (5 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 4 inspections29 violations · 13 high priority
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (2 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (3 high priority)· Call Back - Admin. complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (3 high priority)· Call Back - Admin. complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 11 violations (5 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 5 inspections29 violations · 14 high priority
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (2 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (3 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (1 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (2 high priority)· Call Back - Extension given, pending
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 11 violations (6 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 10 inspections54 violations · 30 high priority
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (2 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 14 violations (9 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 0 violations · Call Back - Complied
No violations recorded for this inspection.
— Routine - Food· 2 violations (1 high priority)· Call Back - Extension given, pending
— Routine - Food· 2 violations (1 high priority)· Call Back - Extension given, pending
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (4 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 3 violations (1 high priority)· Call Back - Admin. complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (3 high priority)· Call Back - Extension given, pending
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (4 high priority)· Call Back - Extension given, pending
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 8 violations (5 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 1 inspection10 violations · 6 high priority
— Routine - Food· 10 violations (6 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Tenders in Orlando: Frequently Asked Questions
- When was Tenders in Orlando last inspected?
- Tenders in Orlando was last inspected by Florida DBPR on September 1, 2026. The result was: Warning Issued.
- What are the most common violations at Tenders in Orlando?
- The most frequently cited violations at Tenders in Orlando are: Proper ventilation, Food contact surfaces, Adequate lighting.
- How many health inspections has Tenders in Orlando had?
- Tenders in Orlando has had 40 inspections on record with Florida DBPR, averaging 9.5 violations per inspection, above the statewide average of 5.2.
- What did the most recent inspection of Tenders in Orlando find?
- Tenders in Orlando was most recently inspected on September 1, 2026 with 12 violation(s), including 1 high-priority violation(s). Disposition: Warning Issued.
- Has Tenders in Orlando ever been shut down?
- No, Tenders in Orlando has no emergency closures on record with Florida DBPR.
- What does Florida violation V02 (Employee health policy) mean?
- Violation 02 (Employee health policy) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/02.
- What does Florida violation V03 (Employee health reporting) mean?
- Violation 03 (Employee health reporting) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/03.
- What does Florida violation V11 (Food in good condition) mean?
- Violation 11 (Food in good condition) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/11.
- Has Tenders in Orlando had any fire safety violations?
- Yes, Tenders in Orlando has 2 fire safety violation(s) on record from Florida state fire inspections.
- Has Tenders in Orlando faced any disciplinary actions?
- Yes, Tenders in Orlando has 5 disciplinary action(s) on record with Florida DBPR totaling $1,900.00 in fines.
- How much has Tenders in Orlando been fined?
- Tenders in Orlando has been fined a total of $1,900.00 across 5 disciplinary action(s) on record with Florida DBPR.
Nearby Establishments to Tenders
Poor Inspection Records Near Orlando
Stories You May Have Missed Orlando
Thunder Burger Orlando Racked Up 10 High-Severity Violations, Stayed Open
A burger restaurant on International Drive had food from unapproved sources, no employee health policy, and toxic chemic…
Editorial Standards & Data Oversight
Data Source: This report is based on official public inspection records from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS).
Editorial Process: Content generated using AI to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.
Disclaimer: All data reflects official state records at time of publication. Facilities may have since corrected cited violations, resolved enforcement actions, or changed ownership.
Editor: All content reviewed and verified by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., Nationally Registered EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
This page is maintained by FloridaFoodSafety.org and is not affiliated with Tenders. How we collect and verify this data.