Twin Peaks in Orlando
Last inspected:
12353 Winter-garden Vineland Rd, Orlando, FL 32836Twin Peaks in Orlando has accumulated 222 violations across 30 inspections, averaging 7.4 violations per inspection—more than 40% above Florida's statewide average of 5.2. The facility has been issued two disciplinary actions totaling $600 in fines. Recurring high-priority violations include employee health reporting violations (cited in at least 5 inspections), chemical storage violations (documented in 10 inspections), and food contact surface violations (cited in at least 4 inspections). The facility has not been emergency-closed. The most recent inspection on February 23, 2026 resulted in Inspection Completed - No Further Action after a complaint-based inspection that documented violations in food contact surfaces, consumer advisory statements, and chemical storage.
Summary generated from Florida DBPR public inspection records.
Twin Peaks in Orlando: Comparison to Orange County Averages
Twin Peaks in Orlando: Fines & Disciplinary Actions (2)
Total fines on record: $600.00
| Action Date | Case Number | Fine | Violation Date | Enforcement Office |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4--2021000347 | $400.00 | Nov 10, 2020 | Miami (Doral) | |
| 4--2019037953 | $200.00 | Jun 18, 2019 | Miami (Doral) |
Twin Peaks in Orlando: Full Inspection History — DBPR (30)
— 1 inspection3 violations · 3 high priority
— Complaint Full· 3 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
— 2 inspections11 violations · 5 high priority
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (2 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 3 inspections22 violations · 16 high priority
— Routine - Food· 10 violations (7 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (3 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 8 violations (6 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 4 inspections26 violations · 23 high priority
— Routine - Food· 2 violations (2 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
— Routine - Food· 13 violations (11 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 2 violations (2 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
— Routine - Food· 9 violations (8 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Basic Violations
— 1 inspection6 violations · 3 high priority
— Food-Licensing Inspection· 6 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 2 inspections17 violations · 15 high priority
— Complaint Full· 9 violations (7 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 8 violations (8 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
— 4 inspections22 violations · 16 high priority
— Routine - Food· 1 violations (1 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
— Routine - Food· 9 violations (6 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Complaint Full· 8 violations (6 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 5 inspections17 violations · 13 high priority
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (4 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Complaint Partial· 0 violations · Admin. Complaint Callback Complied
No violations recorded for this inspection.
— Complaint Partial· 0 violations · Call Back - Complied
No violations recorded for this inspection.
— Complaint Partial· 4 violations (2 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 8 violations (7 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 5 inspections26 violations · 21 high priority
— Routine - Food· 1 violations (1 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
— Routine - Food· 14 violations (11 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Complaint Full· 4 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (5 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 1 violations (1 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
— 2 inspections14 violations · 10 high priority
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (6 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (4 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 1 inspection1 violations
— Food-Licensing Inspection· 1 violations · Inspection Completed - No Further Action
Intermediate Violations
Twin Peaks in Orlando: Frequently Asked Questions
- When was Twin Peaks in Orlando last inspected?
- Twin Peaks in Orlando was last inspected by Florida DBPR on February 23, 2026. The result was: Inspection Completed - No Further Action.
- What are the most common violations at Twin Peaks in Orlando?
- The most frequently cited violations at Twin Peaks in Orlando are: Consumer advisory, Food contact surfaces, Employee health reporting.
- How many health inspections has Twin Peaks in Orlando had?
- Twin Peaks in Orlando has had 30 inspections on record with Florida DBPR, averaging 7.4 violations per inspection, above the statewide average of 5.2.
- What did the most recent inspection of Twin Peaks in Orlando find?
- Twin Peaks in Orlando was most recently inspected on February 23, 2026 with 4 violation(s). Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action.
- Has Twin Peaks in Orlando ever been shut down?
- No, Twin Peaks in Orlando has no emergency closures on record with Florida DBPR.
- What does Florida violation V14 (Food contact surfaces) mean?
- Violation 14 (Food contact surfaces) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/14.
- What does Florida violation V22 (Consumer advisory) mean?
- Violation 22 (Consumer advisory) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/22.
- What does Florida violation V23 (Chemical properly stored) mean?
- Violation 23 (Chemical properly stored) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/23.
- Has Twin Peaks in Orlando faced any disciplinary actions?
- Yes, Twin Peaks in Orlando has 2 disciplinary action(s) on record with Florida DBPR totaling $600.00 in fines.
- How much has Twin Peaks in Orlando been fined?
- Twin Peaks in Orlando has been fined a total of $600.00 across 2 disciplinary action(s) on record with Florida DBPR.
Nearby Establishments to Twin Peaks
Poor Inspection Records Near Orlando
Stories You May Have Missed Orlando
China Lee in Orlando Shut Down for Roaches and Rodents, Its 5th Emergency Closure
Orlando's China Lee was emergency-closed April 28 for roach and rodent activity, its fifth such shutdown since 2018 and …
Editorial Standards & Data Oversight
Data Source: This report is based on official public inspection records from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS).
Editorial Process: Content generated using AI to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.
Disclaimer: All data reflects official state records at time of publication. Facilities may have since corrected cited violations, resolved enforcement actions, or changed ownership.
Editor: All content reviewed and verified by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., Nationally Registered EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
This page is maintained by FloridaFoodSafety.org and is not affiliated with Twin Peaks. How we collect and verify this data.