Creek in Melbourne
Last inspected:
829 E New Haven Ave, Melbourne, FL 32901Creek in Melbourne has accumulated 181 violations across 24 inspections since 2016, averaging 7.5 violations per inspection—more than 40% above the statewide average of 5.2. High-priority violations have been cited repeatedly, including employee health policy violations in at least 5 inspections, chemical storage violations in 10+ inspections, proper hand and arm washing failures in 8+ inspections, and improper cooking temperatures in 3 inspections. The facility has not experienced an emergency closure. Fire safety violations involving portable fire extinguisher gauge failures in the red zone were documented in January and August 2016. Recent inspections show continued compliance challenges: an inspection on March 2, 2026 found 27 violations including high-priority employee health policy, cooking temperature, and chemical storage issues, and was completed with no further action; a December 10, 2025 inspection resulted in call back compliance after 12 violations; and inspections in late October and early November 2025 that issued warnings and extensions for violations including repeated hand-washing, allergen awareness, chemical storage, and food contact surface failures. The facility's most recent inspection on March 2, 2026 was Inspection Completed - No Further Action.
Summary generated from Florida DBPR public inspection records.
Creek in Melbourne: Comparison to Brevard County Averages
Creek in Melbourne: Fire Safety & Life Safety Violations (3)
— 3 fire violations
— Routine - Food · 45-02-4 · Call Back - Extension given, pending
— Routine - Food · 45-02-4 · Warning Issued
— Complaint Full · 45-02-4 · Inspection Completed - No Further Action
Creek in Melbourne: Full Inspection History — DBPR (24)
— 1 inspection9 violations · 5 high priority
— Routine - Food· 9 violations (5 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 5 inspections35 violations · 18 high priority
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (1 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (4 high priority)· Call Back - Extension given, pending
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (4 high priority)· Call Back - Extension given, pending
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (4 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 10 violations (5 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 2 inspections10 violations · 5 high priority
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (2 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 2 inspections5 violations · 3 high priority
— Routine - Food· 2 violations (2 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
— Routine - Food· 3 violations (1 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 3 inspections14 violations · 8 high priority
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (5 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 2 violations · Inspection Completed - No Further Action
— 1 inspection8 violations · 4 high priority
— Routine - Food· 8 violations (4 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 2 inspections12 violations · 6 high priority
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 2 inspections10 violations · 4 high priority
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (2 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (2 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 2 inspections13 violations · 8 high priority
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (5 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 1 inspection1 violations
— Food-Licensing Inspection· 1 violations · Inspection Completed - No Further Action
Intermediate Violations
— 3 inspections23 violations · 14 high priority
— Routine - Food· 2 violations (2 high priority)· Call Back - Complied
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (3 high priority)· Call Back - Extension given, pending
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 14 violations (9 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
Creek in Melbourne: Frequently Asked Questions
- When was Creek in Melbourne last inspected?
- Creek in Melbourne was last inspected by Florida DBPR on March 2, 2026. The result was: Inspection Completed - No Further Action.
- What are the most common violations at Creek in Melbourne?
- The most frequently cited violations at Creek in Melbourne are: Proper ventilation, Food contact surfaces, Chemical properly stored.
- How many health inspections has Creek in Melbourne had?
- Creek in Melbourne has had 24 inspections on record with Florida DBPR, averaging 7.5 violations per inspection, above the statewide average of 5.2.
- What did the most recent inspection of Creek in Melbourne find?
- Creek in Melbourne was most recently inspected on March 2, 2026 with 10 violation(s), including 1 high-priority violation(s). Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action.
- Has Creek in Melbourne ever been shut down?
- No, Creek in Melbourne has no emergency closures on record with Florida DBPR.
- What does Florida violation V02 (Employee health policy) mean?
- Violation 02 (Employee health policy) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/02.
- What does Florida violation V08 (Proper hand/arm washing) mean?
- Violation 08 (Proper hand/arm washing) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/08.
- What does Florida violation V16 (Proper cooking temps) mean?
- Violation 16 (Proper cooking temps) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/16.
- Has Creek in Melbourne had any fire safety violations?
- Yes, Creek in Melbourne has 3 fire safety violation(s) on record from Florida state fire inspections.
- Has Creek in Melbourne operated under other names?
- Yes, this location previously operated as: Pc Keats (2016-2016).
Nearby Establishments to Creek
Poor Inspection Records Near Melbourne
Stories You May Have Missed Melbourne
Melbourne Convenience Store Failed Food Safety Basics at March 2026 Opening Inspection
Blok 07 Lounge in Melbourne had no certified food manager, a person in charge who couldn't answer basic employee health …
Editorial Standards & Data Oversight
Data Source: This report is based on official public inspection records from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS).
Editorial Process: Content generated using AI to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.
Disclaimer: All data reflects official state records at time of publication. Facilities may have since corrected cited violations, resolved enforcement actions, or changed ownership.
Editor: All content reviewed and verified by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., Nationally Registered EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
This page is maintained by FloridaFoodSafety.org and is not affiliated with Creek. How we collect and verify this data.