Peking Palace in Belle Glade
Last inspected:
531 S Main St, Belle Glade, FL 33430Peking Palace in Belle Glade has accumulated 193 violations across 30 inspections since 2016, averaging 6.4 per visit. The restaurant was shut down twice, once for roach activity and once for rodent activity. In 2018, inspectors cited electrical wiring in disrepair, with the operator using an extension cord to power the dishwasher, a hazard documented across multiple follow-up inspections. The facility has faced 7 disciplinary actions totaling $4,720 in fines, with the largest penalty reaching $1,120.
Most recent closure: February 11, 2020 for rodent activity.
Summary generated from Florida DBPR public inspection records.
Peking Palace in Belle Glade: Comparison to Palm Beach County Averages
This Facility
6.4
violations / inspection
6.4 violations per inspection
Palm Beach County Avg
3.77
violations / inspection
3.77 county average
This Facility
2
emergency closures
2 closures
Palm Beach County Avg
0.24
closures / facility
0.24 county average
Peking Palace in Belle Glade: Emergency Closure History (2)
Peking Palace in Belle Glade: Fines & Disciplinary Actions (7)
Total fines on record: $4,720.00
| Action Date | Case Number | Fine | Violation Date | Enforcement Office |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2--2024043358 | $600.00 | Jul 2, 2024 | Miami (Doral) | |
| 2--2024022416 | $400.00 | Mar 28, 2024 | Miami (Doral) | |
| 2--2022034620 | $400.00 | Jul 5, 2022 | Miami (Doral) | |
| 2--2022007503 | $600.00 | Jan 12, 2022 | Tampa | |
| 2--2018064616 | $800.00 | Dec 22, 2018 | Fort Lauderdale | |
| 2--2019002402 | $800.00 | Jan 9, 2019 | Fort Lauderdale | |
| 2--2018053372 | $1,120.00 | Oct 9, 2018 | Fort Myers |
Peking Palace in Belle Glade: Fire Safety & Life Safety Violations (3)
— 3 fire violations
— Routine - Food · 47-03-4 · Emergency Order Callback Complied
Inspector Observation: - From initial inspection : Observed electrical wiring in disrepair. For reporting purposes only. Electrical out not working at dishwasher. Operator using an extension cord to run dishwasher - From follow-up inspection 2018-12-21: Remains the same - From follow-up inspection 2018-12-22: Operator is using an extension cord for the dishwasher **Time Extended**
Legal Basis: Reporting: (d) The division, or its agent, shall notify the local firesafety authority or the State Fire Marshal of any readily observable violation of a rule adopted under chapter 633 which relates to public lodging establishments or public food establishments, and the identification of such violation does not require any firesafety inspection certification. For reporting purposes only.
— Routine - Food · 47-03-4 · Emergency Order Callback Not Complied
Inspector Observation: - From initial inspection : Observed electrical wiring in disrepair. For reporting purposes only. Electrical out not working at dishwasher. Operator using an extension cord to run dishwasher - From follow-up inspection 2018-12-21: Remains the same
Legal Basis: Reporting: (d) The division, or its agent, shall notify the local firesafety authority or the State Fire Marshal of any readily observable violation of a rule adopted under chapter 633 which relates to public lodging establishments or public food establishments, and the identification of such violation does not require any firesafety inspection certification. For reporting purposes only.
— Routine - Food · 47-03-4 · Emergency order recommended
Inspector Observation: Observed electrical wiring in disrepair. For reporting purposes only. Electrical out not working at dishwasher. Operator using an extension cord to run dishwasher
Legal Basis: Reporting: (d) The division, or its agent, shall notify the local firesafety authority or the State Fire Marshal of any readily observable violation of a rule adopted under chapter 633 which relates to public lodging establishments or public food establishments, and the identification of such violation does not require any firesafety inspection certification. For reporting purposes only.
Peking Palace in Belle Glade: Full Inspection History — DBPR (30)
— 1 inspection2 violations · 2 high priority
— Routine - Food· 2 violations (2 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
— 2 inspections10 violations · 8 high priority
— Routine - Food· 7 violations (5 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 3 violations (3 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
— 3 inspections12 violations · 10 high priority
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (5 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
— Routine - Food· 3 violations (2 high priority)· Call Back - Admin. complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (3 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 3 inspections9 violations · 6 high priority
— Routine - Food· 0 violations · Call Back - Complied
No violations recorded for this inspection.
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (5 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 3 violations (1 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 2 inspections3 violations · 2 high priority
— Routine - Food· 1 violations (1 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
— Routine - Food· 2 violations (1 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
— 2 inspections9 violations · 7 high priority
— Routine - Food· 1 violations (1 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
— Routine - Food· 8 violations (6 high priority)· Administrative complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 4 inspections29 violations · 18 high priority
— Routine - Food· 8 violations (7 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 4 violations (2 high priority)· Emergency Order Callback Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 8 violations (4 high priority)· Emergency Order Callback Not Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 9 violations (5 high priority)· Emergency order recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 5 inspections23 violations · 17 high priority
— Routine - Food· 9 violations (7 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 0 violations · Admin. Complaint Callback Complied
No violations recorded for this inspection.
— Routine - Food· 0 violations · Admin. Complaint Callback Complied
No violations recorded for this inspection.
— Routine - Food· 3 violations (2 high priority)· Emergency Order Callback Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 11 violations (8 high priority)· Emergency order recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— 6 inspections42 violations · 20 high priority
— Routine - Food· 1 violations · Emergency Order Callback Complied
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (1 high priority)· Emergency Order Callback Not Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 5 violations (3 high priority)· Admin. Complaint Callback Not Complied
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 13 violations (7 high priority)· Emergency order recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— Routine - Food· 6 violations (3 high priority)· Call Back - Admin. complaint recommended
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
— Routine - Food· 12 violations (6 high priority)· Warning Issued
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 1 inspection8 violations · 5 high priority
— Routine - Food· 8 violations (5 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Basic Violations
— 1 inspection9 violations · 8 high priority
— Routine - Food· 9 violations (8 high priority)· Inspection Completed - No Further Action
High Priority Violations
Intermediate Violations
Peking Palace in Belle Glade: Frequently Asked Questions
- When was Peking Palace in Belle Glade last inspected?
- Peking Palace in Belle Glade was last inspected by Florida DBPR on January 27, 2026. The result was: Inspection Completed - No Further Action.
- When was Peking Palace in Belle Glade last shut down?
- Peking Palace in Belle Glade was last shut down on February 11, 2020 for rodent activity. This data reflects state records at time of publication. The facility may have since resolved these issues.
- What are the most common violations at Peking Palace in Belle Glade?
- The most frequently cited violations at Peking Palace in Belle Glade are: Proper hand/arm washing, Employee health reporting, Food contact surfaces.
- How many health inspections has Peking Palace in Belle Glade had?
- Peking Palace in Belle Glade has had 30 inspections on record with Florida DBPR, averaging 6.4 violations per inspection, above the statewide average of 5.2.
- What did the most recent inspection of Peking Palace in Belle Glade find?
- Peking Palace in Belle Glade was most recently inspected on January 27, 2026 with 2 violation(s), including 2 high-priority violation(s). Disposition: Inspection Completed - No Further Action.
- Has Peking Palace in Belle Glade ever been shut down?
- Yes, Peking Palace in Belle Glade has been emergency-closed 2 times by Florida DBPR inspectors.
- What does Florida violation V01 (Management awareness) mean?
- Violation 01 (Management awareness) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/01.
- What does Florida violation V03 (Employee health reporting) mean?
- Violation 03 (Employee health reporting) is classified as a high priority violation under Florida DBPR food safety regulations. See the full explanation at floridafoodsafety.org/violation/03.
- Has Peking Palace in Belle Glade had any fire safety violations?
- Yes, Peking Palace in Belle Glade has 3 fire safety violation(s) on record from Florida state fire inspections.
- Has Peking Palace in Belle Glade faced any disciplinary actions?
- Yes, Peking Palace in Belle Glade has 7 disciplinary action(s) on record with Florida DBPR totaling $4,720.00 in fines.
- How much has Peking Palace in Belle Glade been fined?
- Peking Palace in Belle Glade has been fined a total of $4,720.00 across 7 disciplinary action(s) on record with Florida DBPR.
- Has Peking Palace in Belle Glade operated under other names?
- Yes, this location previously operated as: Peking Place (2018-2018).
Nearby Establishments to Peking Palace
Poor Inspection Records Near Belle Glade
Stories You May Have Missed Belle Glade
Belle Glade Cuban Restaurant Emergency-Closed for Fly Activity in April 2026
El Sabor Cubano at 1240 NW 16 St was emergency-closed April 13 after inspectors documented fly activity severe enough to…
Editorial Standards & Data Oversight
Data Source: This report is based on official public inspection records from the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS).
Editorial Process: Content generated using AI to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.
Disclaimer: All data reflects official state records at time of publication. Facilities may have since corrected cited violations, resolved enforcement actions, or changed ownership.
Editor: All content reviewed and verified by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., Nationally Registered EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
This page is maintained by FloridaFoodSafety.org and is not affiliated with Peking Palace. How we collect and verify this data.