HIALEAH, FL. When state inspectors walked into Trigo on West 49th Street on May 7, they found a restaurant with no written policy requiring sick employees to report their symptoms, no adequate handwashing facilities, improperly stored toxic substances, and a failure to follow parasite destruction procedures for fish. Eight high-severity violations in a single visit. The restaurant was not closed.

That last fact matters. Under Florida's inspection framework, an emergency closure is triggered when conditions pose an immediate threat to public health. State inspectors determined that eight high-severity findings, stacked on top of a record showing more than 180 violations over 27 prior inspections, did not meet that threshold.

What Inspectors Found

1HIGHNo employee health policy or inadequate policyHigh severity
2HIGHEmployee not reporting symptoms of illnessHigh severity
3HIGHInadequate handwashing facilitiesHigh severity
4HIGHImproper hand and arm washing techniqueHigh severity
5HIGHInadequate shell stock identification/recordsHigh severity
6HIGHParasite destruction procedures not followedHigh severity
7HIGHTime as a public health control not properly usedHigh severity
8HIGHToxic substances improperly identified/stored/usedHigh severity
9INTMulti-use utensils not properly cleanedIntermediate
10INTInadequate or improperly maintained toilet facilitiesIntermediate

The two illness-related violations sit at the top of any risk ranking. Inspectors cited Trigo both for lacking a written employee health policy and for employees not reporting symptoms of illness. These are not the same violation, and finding both together is significant.

The handwashing findings compounded the picture. Inspectors documented inadequate handwashing facilities and separately cited improper hand and arm washing technique. A kitchen where workers cannot wash their hands properly, and where no policy governs what happens when someone shows up sick, is a kitchen where pathogens move.

Toxic substances were improperly identified, stored, or used. Inspectors also found that time was not being used correctly as a public health control, meaning food was left in the temperature danger zone longer than permitted under the rules that substitute time tracking for refrigeration. Multi-use utensils were not properly cleaned, a citation that carries its own contamination risk when layered on top of the handwashing failures.

The shellfish and fish violations added a different dimension. Inspectors found inadequate shell stock identification records, and separately documented that parasite destruction procedures for fish were not being followed.

What These Violations Mean

The combination of no employee health policy and employees not reporting illness symptoms is, according to public health researchers, the leading cause of multi-victim foodborne outbreaks. Norovirus spreads directly from an infected food worker to customers through contaminated food. A written policy is the mechanism that gives sick workers a documented reason to stay home and managers a legal basis to send them home. Without it, the decision is informal and often financial.

The handwashing violations deserve to be read together, not separately. Inadequate facilities means there may not be a functioning, accessible handwashing station where workers need one. Improper technique means that even when workers attempt to wash their hands, they are not removing pathogens effectively. Both violations present at the same time means the hygiene chain is broken at two points simultaneously.

The parasite destruction finding applies to fish served raw or undercooked, including sushi and ceviche preparations. Without verified freezing to required temperatures and times, parasites including Anisakis can survive into the finished dish. The shellfish traceability violation is a companion risk: without proper shell stock tags and records, there is no way to trace an oyster, clam, or mussel back to its harvest bed if customers become ill.

Improperly stored or unlabeled toxic substances create a direct chemical contamination risk. This is not a paperwork violation. If a cleaning chemical is stored above a food prep surface or in an unlabeled container, the path from that container to a customer's plate is short.

The Longer Record

The May 7 inspection was not an aberration. It was Trigo's worst single-visit total in the data, but the surrounding inspections tell a consistent story. The January 2026 visit produced 6 high-severity and 2 intermediate violations. The September 2024 visit produced 5 high-severity violations. March 2024 produced 6 high-severity violations.

Going back further, the February 2025 inspection found 4 high-severity and 3 intermediate violations. September 2023 found 4 high-severity violations. February 2023 found 5 high-severity and 2 intermediate violations. Across 27 inspections on record, the facility has accumulated 188 total violations.

Not once has Trigo been emergency-closed. The state's records show zero prior emergency closures in the facility's history, a fact that stands in contrast to the volume and severity of what inspectors have consistently documented.

The illness-reporting and employee health policy violations that appeared on May 7 are not new categories for a restaurant in this inspection pattern. A kitchen that has drawn high-severity citations in six of the last eight documented inspections is not a kitchen that is occasionally having a bad day.

Still Open

After the May 7 inspection, Trigo remained open for business. State inspectors documented 8 high-severity violations, noted that workers were not reporting illness symptoms and that the facility had no adequate policy requiring them to, and found that fish was being served without verified parasite destruction procedures. They left the restaurant operating.

That is where the public record ends.