FORT LAUDERDALE, FL. An inspector visiting Essenza Italian Eatery and Market on East Commercial Boulevard on June 18 found that the restaurant was serving food from unapproved or unknown sources, a violation that means inspectors could not verify that what customers were eating had ever passed a federal safety check.

That was one of seven high-severity violations documented in a single visit. The restaurant was not closed.

What Inspectors Found

1HIGHFood from unapproved or unknown sourceNo federal safety inspection
2HIGHEmployee not reporting illness symptomsDirect outbreak risk
3HIGHFood in poor condition, mislabeled, or adulteratedFoodborne illness hazard
4HIGHInadequate shell stock identification/recordsShellfish traceability failure
5HIGHTime as public health control not properly usedTemperature danger zone exposure
6HIGHImproper hand and arm washing techniquePathogen transfer risk
7HIGHPerson in charge not present or not performing dutiesManagement control failure

The shellfish citation added a second layer of sourcing concern. Inspectors noted inadequate shell stock identification and records, meaning the restaurant could not demonstrate where its oysters, clams, or mussels came from or when they were harvested. Shellfish are among the highest-risk foods served in any restaurant because they are often eaten raw or only lightly cooked.

At least one employee was found not reporting symptoms of illness, and an inspector documented improper hand and arm washing technique. Those two violations together describe a scenario where a sick employee could be handling food without adequate hand hygiene.

The inspector also cited food in poor condition, mislabeled, or adulterated, and found that time was not being used properly as a public health control. When a restaurant uses time rather than temperature to keep food safe, it must track exactly how long food has been in the temperature danger zone. Without that tracking, there is no way to know how long customers have been exposed to the risk.

No one with managerial authority was present or performing supervisory duties during the inspection.

What These Violations Mean

Food from unapproved sources is not a paperwork problem. Every licensed food supplier in Florida is subject to USDA or FDA inspection, which creates a traceable chain from producer to plate. When a restaurant sources food outside that system, there is no record to pull if a customer gets sick, and no guarantee the food was handled safely before it arrived. At Essenza, that violation appeared alongside a citation for food in poor condition or adulterated, meaning the sourcing concern was not theoretical.

The employee illness violation carries a direct transmission risk that most diners do not think about. Norovirus, one of the most common causes of restaurant-linked outbreaks, spreads readily from an infected food worker to customers when symptoms go unreported and the employee continues handling food. The improper handwashing citation compounds that risk: even an employee who attempts to wash their hands may leave pathogens behind if the technique is wrong.

The shellfish traceability failure matters because oysters and clams can harbor Vibrio bacteria and other pathogens that cause rapid, severe illness. State and federal rules require restaurants to keep shellfish tags on file for 90 days precisely so that a contaminated harvest can be traced and recalled. Without those records, a contaminated batch at Essenza could not be connected to an outbreak after the fact.

The absence of a person in charge performing duties is not a standalone violation. CDC data ties establishments without active managerial control to three times as many critical violations as those with it. On June 18, every other high-severity violation on the list was found in a restaurant where no one in authority was actively overseeing operations.

The Longer Record

Essenza has four inspections on record, all within roughly ten months. The three visits before June 18 produced a combined total of three high-severity violations across the entire period. The June 18 inspection produced seven in a single visit.

The prior inspections do not suggest a facility that has been chronically struggling. The May 20 visit found zero high-severity violations and zero intermediate violations. The April 27 visit found one high-severity violation. The August 2025 visit found two. None of those inspections resulted in an emergency closure.

That makes the June 18 inspection a sharp departure, not a continuation of a documented pattern. A restaurant that passed cleanly five weeks earlier returned seven high-severity violations on its next visit, including violations in categories, food sourcing, shellfish traceability, and employee illness reporting, that go to the most fundamental food safety controls a restaurant is expected to maintain.

The facility has never been emergency-closed.

Open for Business

After the June 18 inspection, Essenza Italian Eatery and Market remained open to the public. State inspectors documented seven high-severity violations, including food from an unapproved source, a sick employee not reporting symptoms, and shellfish with no traceable origin. No emergency closure order was issued.

The restaurant's next inspection has not yet appeared in state records.