SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL. State inspectors visiting Sakada Japanese Steak House at 120 San Marco Ave on July 9 found food being served from unapproved or unknown sources, toxic substances improperly stored or used, and no functioning employee health policy, yet the restaurant was not emergency-closed.

The inspection logged seven high-severity violations and three intermediate violations. Seven high-severity citations at a single inspection is a count that has triggered emergency closures at this same restaurant before.

What Inspectors Found

1HIGHFood from unapproved or unknown sourceHigh severity
2HIGHToxic substances improperly identified/stored/usedHigh severity
3HIGHNo employee health policy or inadequate policyHigh severity
4HIGHEmployee not reporting symptoms of illnessHigh severity
5HIGHImproper hand and arm washing techniqueHigh severity
6HIGHTime as a public health control not properly usedHigh severity
7HIGHPerson in charge not present or not performing dutiesHigh severity
8INTImproper sewage or waste water disposalIntermediate
9INTInadequate ventilation and lightingIntermediate
10INTInadequate or improperly maintained toilet facilitiesIntermediate

The food sourcing violation stands as the most immediately consequential finding. Inspectors documented that food served to customers came from unapproved or unknown sources, meaning it bypassed standard USDA and FDA safety inspections.

Alongside that, inspectors cited toxic substances being improperly identified, stored, or used inside the facility. That violation creates a direct risk of chemical contamination of food being prepared and plated for diners.

No person in charge was present or performing supervisory duties at the time of the inspection. That finding alone, health regulators have long noted, correlates with a cascade of other failures, and the remaining six high-severity violations at Sakada on July 9 illustrate exactly why.

What These Violations Mean

The food sourcing violation is not a paperwork problem. When a restaurant cannot identify where its food came from, there is no chain of custody if a customer gets sick. If an ingredient is later linked to a Listeria or Salmonella outbreak, investigators cannot trace it back through the supply chain, and other victims may not be identified in time.

The employee illness violations compounded that risk on July 9. Inspectors found both that the restaurant had no adequate written health policy and that employees were not reporting illness symptoms. Norovirus, which causes the majority of foodborne illness outbreaks in restaurant settings, spreads most efficiently when sick workers handle food without restriction. A written policy exists specifically to give employees a framework and legal cover to stay home.

Improper handwashing technique is distinct from not washing hands at all. It means a worker goes through the motion, and pathogens remain. Studies have found that even workers who intend to wash properly leave contamination on their hands when technique is flawed, making the violation more insidious than a simple omission.

The time-as-public-health-control violation means food that should have been tracked and discarded after a set window was not being managed that way. When temperature control is replaced with time tracking, the margin for error is narrow. When the tracking lapses, food that has been sitting in the bacterial growth range, between 41 and 135 degrees, can reach unsafe pathogen levels with no visible sign that anything is wrong.

The Longer Record

Sakada has 26 inspections on record and 252 total violations documented across that history. That is not a facility in an isolated rough patch.

The July 9 inspection is not the worst on record. On March 28, 2024, inspectors found seven high-severity and three intermediate violations, an identical high-severity count. On September 23, 2023, the tally was seven high-severity and four intermediate violations. On January 8, 2025, inspectors found five high-severity and three intermediate violations.

The restaurant has been emergency-closed twice. Both closures were for roach and rodent activity: once on October 23, 2024, with a reopening the following day, and again on September 23, 2025, also with a next-day reopening. In each case, a follow-up inspection cleared the facility within 24 hours.

The pattern across those closures is worth noting. Each time, the facility passed a follow-up inspection quickly and returned to operation. The January 2026 inspection, the most recent before July, found four high-severity violations and one intermediate. The September 2025 follow-up after the closure showed zero high-severity and zero intermediate violations. The July 9 count of seven high-severity violations represents the highest single-inspection total since those prior seven-violation inspections in 2023 and 2024.

Open for Business

State inspectors documented ten violations on July 9, seven of them at the highest severity level, including food of unknown origin, toxic substances in improper condition, no active management oversight, no employee health policy, workers not reporting illness, flawed handwashing, and food not being tracked under time controls. They also found improper sewage or wastewater disposal, inadequate ventilation, and inadequate toilet facilities.

Sakada Japanese Steak House was not emergency-closed. It remained open to serve customers that evening.