JACKSONVILLE, FL. An inspector visiting Pandan Leaves at 725 Skymarks Drive on June 10 found that at least one employee had failed to report illness symptoms, a violation federal health officials identify as the leading cause of multi-victim foodborne outbreaks. The restaurant was not closed.
That single citation would be serious on its own. But inspectors documented five additional high-severity violations during the same visit, and the restaurant continued serving customers.
What Inspectors Found
The June 10 inspection produced six high-severity violations and zero intermediate ones. All six fell into the category the state treats as most directly threatening to public health.
The person in charge was either absent or not actively performing supervisory duties during the inspection. CDC data links establishments without active managerial control to three times as many critical violations as those with engaged management on the floor.
Inspectors also cited inadequate handwashing facilities and, separately, improper hand and arm washing technique. Both violations were noted in the same visit, meaning the restaurant lacked both the infrastructure and the practice to prevent pathogens from reaching food through workers' hands.
Food contact surfaces were not properly cleaned or sanitized. And toxic chemicals were improperly stored or labeled near food, creating a direct risk of chemical contamination.
What These Violations Mean
The illness-reporting failure is the violation with the most immediate consequence for anyone who ate at Pandan Leaves around the time of the inspection. When a food worker sick with norovirus, salmonella, or a similar pathogen continues working without reporting symptoms, every dish that person handles becomes a potential transmission vehicle. A single infected worker in a kitchen can seed an outbreak affecting dozens of customers before the first person calls in sick.
The handwashing violations compound that risk directly. Improper technique, even when a worker makes an attempt to wash, leaves enough pathogens on the hands to contaminate food. Without adequate facilities, proper technique is not even possible. These two violations together describe a kitchen where hand hygiene was failing at every level on the day inspectors arrived.
Improperly cleaned food contact surfaces, such as cutting boards, prep tables, and utensils, allow bacteria from one food item to transfer to the next. If raw protein residue remains on a surface used for ready-to-eat food, the person eating that food has no way of knowing it was there.
The chemical storage violation carries a different but acute risk. Cleaning agents stored near or above food, or mislabeled containers, can contaminate ingredients directly. Unlike a bacterial illness that takes hours or days to develop, chemical poisoning can cause symptoms within minutes of consumption.
The Longer Record
The June 10 inspection was not the first time Pandan Leaves drew serious citations. State records show the restaurant has been inspected ten times in total, accumulating 82 violations across that history.
Pandan Leaves: Inspection History
The pattern here is not a restaurant that stumbled once. Of ten inspections on record, only two produced zero violations. Every other visit found high-severity citations, and three of those visits produced seven or more high-severity violations in a single inspection.
The restaurant passed clean in May 2024, then returned to seven high-severity violations by November of the same year. It passed again in November 2024, then accumulated seven more high-severity violations by March 2025. That cycle, clean inspection followed by a return to serious violations, appears four times across the record.
The restaurant has never been emergency-closed despite accumulating 82 total violations and never sustaining a clean record for more than a single consecutive inspection.
Still Open
After the June 10 inspection, Pandan Leaves remained open to the public. The six high-severity violations, including the illness-reporting failure and the chemical storage citation, were not enough to trigger a closure order under the circumstances documented that day.
Customers who ate there in the days following the inspection had no way of knowing what the inspector's report contained.