PALM BAY, FL. Inspectors cited a Palm Bay McDonald's for four high-severity violations during the week of April 18, 2026, including food not cooked to required minimum temperatures and toxic chemicals improperly stored near food preparation areas, records show.

The McDonald's at 1179 Malabar Rd NE drew the highest violation count of any facility inspected in Palm Bay that week, with four high-severity and four intermediate citations in a single visit. The location also had no consumer advisory posted for raw or undercooked foods, and inspectors found food contact surfaces that had not been properly cleaned or sanitized.

The chemical storage citation is among the most immediately dangerous violations inspectors can document. Toxic substances found near food or improperly labeled create a direct route for chemical contamination of meals before they ever reach a customer.

9Total high-severity violations across 3 Palm Bay facilities
4High-severity violations at McDonald's on Malabar Rd
4High-severity violations at Evo Catering on Minton Rd
48Prior inspections on record at Shack Riverfront

What Inspectors Found

The intermediate violations at the Malabar Road McDonald's compounded the picture. Inspectors documented multi-use utensils not properly cleaned, improper sanitizing solution or procedures, inadequate ventilation and lighting, and equipment in poor repair. When sanitizer concentration is wrong, pathogens survive on surfaces that workers and customers assume are clean.

The week's second facility with four high-severity violations was a different kind of operation. Evo Catering at 5070 Minton Rd NW, Suite 1 drew citations for no person in charge present or performing duties, no written employee health policy, no consumer advisory for raw or undercooked foods, and toxic substances improperly identified, stored, or used. The catering operation had zero intermediate violations, meaning every citation inspectors wrote was in the highest severity category.

The absence of a person in charge is not a paperwork problem. CDC data cited in the inspection record links establishments without active managerial control to three times as many critical violations. At a catering operation, which may be preparing food for large groups at off-site events, that gap in oversight reaches beyond the facility's four walls.

Shack Riverfront at 4845 Dixie Hwy NE drew one high-severity and one intermediate violation. The high-severity citation was for required procedures for specialized processes not being followed. Specialized processes, which include smoking, curing, fermenting, and reduced-oxygen packaging, require precise controls because they are designed to prevent pathogen growth in conditions where standard cooking temperatures are not applied. When those controls are not followed, the safety margin those processes provide disappears.

What These Violations Mean

The undercooking citation at McDonald's carries a specific danger that the inspection record names directly. Salmonella in poultry survives below 165 degrees Fahrenheit. At a fast-food restaurant processing high volumes of chicken products daily, a temperature failure is not an isolated event. It affects every order that moves through the line while the problem persists, and customers have no way to know.

The missing consumer advisory at both McDonald's and Evo Catering represents a different kind of failure. Customers who are elderly, pregnant, immunocompromised, or caring for young children face elevated risk from raw or undercooked foods. A consumer advisory on a menu is the mechanism that lets those customers make an informed choice. Without it, the choice is made for them, and they do not know it.

The employee health policy citation at Evo Catering points to a transmission risk that has nothing to do with cooking temperatures or surface sanitation. Without a written policy, sick workers have no formal requirement to report illness and no clear guidance to stay away from food. Norovirus, which sickens an estimated 20 million Americans annually, spreads through exactly this route. A catering company preparing food for events attended by dozens or hundreds of people amplifies that risk considerably.

At Shack Riverfront, the inadequate ventilation citation carries a less visible but real hazard. Grease-laden vapors and accumulated smoke in an enclosed kitchen are not just comfort problems. They coat surfaces and equipment, creating conditions where bacteria can persist even after cleaning.

The Longer Record

Shack Riverfront has the longest inspection history of the three facilities, with 48 prior inspections on record. Forty-eight visits from state inspectors represents years of regulatory contact, and the facility's current high-severity citation for specialized process failures is the kind of violation that requires deliberate procedural attention, not a quick fix. A restaurant with that many inspections behind it has had ample opportunity to establish and document the required controls.

McDonald's at 1179 Malabar Rd has 17 prior inspections on record. That is a shorter history than Shack Riverfront but long enough that the combination of four high-severity violations in a single week, including undercooking and chemical storage failures alongside a full slate of intermediate citations, is a significant accumulation. Seventeen inspections is not a new location still finding its footing.

Evo Catering at 5070 Minton Rd has 24 prior inspections on record. A catering operation with two dozen inspections in its history that still lacks a written employee health policy and has no person in charge present during an inspection is not encountering these requirements for the first time. The employee health policy violation in particular is one of the most straightforward compliance items a food service operation can address, requiring documentation rather than equipment or infrastructure.

The Pattern

All three facilities cited this week share one violation in common, either directly or structurally: a gap between what is required and what is being done at the management level. At Evo Catering, no one in charge was present. At McDonald's, the sanitizing procedures and equipment maintenance had lapsed alongside more acute failures. At Shack Riverfront, the specialized process controls required by the state were not being followed.

The consumer advisory violation appeared at two of the three facilities, McDonald's and Evo Catering, in the same inspection week. That citation is one of the more visible compliance items in a restaurant, typically requiring posted language on a menu or board. Both facilities lacked it.

What the records do not show is whether Evo Catering's four high-severity violations were corrected before the catering company's next scheduled event.