SUNRISE, FL. Inspectors visiting La Perla Seafood Bar & Grill at 1396 SW 160 Ave on July 20 found the restaurant could not document where its shellfish came from, a violation that means if a customer got sick from a bad oyster or clam, health investigators would have no chain of custody to trace.

That was one of nine high-severity violations cited that day. The restaurant remained open.

What Inspectors Found

1HIGHFood from unapproved or unknown sourcetraceability failure
2HIGHInadequate shell stock identification/recordsshellfish outbreak risk
3HIGHNo employee health policydisease transmission
4HIGHEmployee not reporting illness symptomsoutbreak enabler
5HIGHImproper handwashing techniquepathogen transfer
6HIGHInadequate handwashing facilitieshygiene infrastructure
7HIGHFood contact surfaces not properly sanitizedcross-contamination
8HIGHNo consumer advisory for raw/undercooked foodsuninformed diners
9HIGHPerson in charge not present or not performing dutiesmanagement failure
10INTInadequate ventilation and lightingair quality

The shellfish violations sit at the top of the list for a reason. La Perla is a seafood restaurant. Oysters, clams, and mussels are consumed raw or barely cooked, and they are among the highest-risk foods for Vibrio, norovirus, and hepatitis A. State law requires restaurants to keep shellfish tags, the paper records that travel with each bag from a certified harvester, on file for 90 days. Without those records, there is no way to identify the source if customers become ill.

The food sourcing violation compounds that risk. Inspectors also cited the restaurant for receiving food from an unapproved or unknown source, meaning some portion of what was being served that day had bypassed USDA and FDA inspection entirely.

The handwashing picture was equally troubling. Inspectors cited both inadequate handwashing facilities and improper handwashing technique, meaning the physical infrastructure to wash hands correctly was not in place, and employees were not washing correctly even when they tried. Those two violations together describe a kitchen where pathogen transfer between surfaces, food, and hands was effectively uncontrolled.

The person in charge was either absent or not performing supervisory duties. CDC research has consistently found that restaurants without active managerial control accumulate critical violations at roughly three times the rate of those with engaged management on the floor.

What These Violations Mean

The combination of no employee health policy and no illness reporting, cited together on the same inspection, describes a specific and well-documented pathway to a multi-victim outbreak. Norovirus, which causes roughly 20 million illnesses in the United States each year, spreads most efficiently when a sick food worker handles food with no policy requiring them to stay home or report symptoms. La Perla had neither requirement in place on July 20.

The food contact surface violation adds another layer. Cutting boards, prep surfaces, and utensils that are not properly cleaned and sanitized between uses transfer bacteria directly onto food. In a seafood kitchen, where raw shellfish and cooked items often share workspace, that cross-contamination risk is acute.

The missing consumer advisory matters most to the most vulnerable diners. Pregnant women, elderly customers, and people with compromised immune systems face serious illness from raw or undercooked seafood. State rules require restaurants serving those items to post a written warning. La Perla had none.

Taken together, these nine violations do not describe isolated lapses. They describe a kitchen where the foundational systems for food safety, sourcing controls, illness policies, handwashing infrastructure, surface sanitation, and management oversight, were simultaneously absent on the same day.

The Longer Record

The July 20 inspection was not an anomaly. State records show La Perla has been inspected 36 times, accumulating 384 total violations across its history. The restaurant has never been emergency-closed.

The recent pattern is consistent. On January 20, 2026, inspectors cited 9 high-severity violations and 3 intermediate ones, the same high-severity count as the July inspection. On December 9, 2024, the restaurant again drew 9 high-severity violations and 2 intermediate ones. On July 28, 2025, it was 5 high-severity violations; on March 3, 2025, it was 6.

The one clean inspection in that stretch, July 29, 2025, came one day after the 5-violation visit. The July 21, 2026 follow-up inspection showed zero high-severity violations and one intermediate, suggesting the restaurant addressed the cited issues quickly once inspectors returned. That is a recurring pattern in the records: serious violations on one visit, a clean or near-clean follow-up the next day.

What the history does not show is any sustained period without high-severity citations. In eight of the most recent inspections on record, six produced high-severity violations. The categories that keep reappearing, food sourcing, illness policies, handwashing, management presence, are not equipment failures that wear out or plumbing problems that require a contractor. They are operational choices.

Still Open

Florida's emergency closure authority is triggered when an inspector determines that conditions pose an immediate threat to public health. Nine high-severity violations at a seafood restaurant, including unknown food sources, no shellfish traceability, and no illness reporting system, did not meet that threshold on July 20.

The follow-up inspection the next day found the violations corrected. Customers who ate at La Perla on July 20 had no way of knowing any of this.

The restaurant has now been cited for 9 high-severity violations in a single inspection on three separate occasions in the past two years. It has never been closed.