, FL. The person in charge at Grandma Sheri Triple J'S Triple The Squeeze Lemonade & Sweets could not answer questions about employee health when a state inspector asked, according to records from a September 10, 2026 inspection by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
The mobile vendor met sanitation inspection requirements overall, but the visit turned up two violations tied directly to what the person running the stand knew, and what paperwork the operation carried.
What Inspectors Found
UNRESOLVED AT INSPECTION
RESOLVED AT INSPECTION
The first violation was straightforward. The inspector noted that the person in charge was "unable to answer questions on employee health," and that industry documents were provided during the visit. Neither violation was corrected on site in the sense that the operation already had the knowledge or paperwork before the inspector arrived.
The second violation followed the same pattern. The inspector noted that the establishment "did not have any written procedures for cleanup of vomit and diarrhea," and that documentation was handed over during the inspection.
Both violations are classified as priority foundation, a category that sits one level below the most serious priority violations but above basic housekeeping citations. Neither was marked as a repeat.
What These Violations Mean
The employee health violation is not about whether workers are currently sick. It is about whether the person running the operation knows what to do if they become sick, or if a customer reports getting ill after buying food there.
State food safety rules require the person in charge at any food operation, including a mobile vendor, to be able to explain when a sick employee must be excluded from work and when they can return. If that person cannot answer those questions, there is no guarantee a symptomatic worker would be sent home before handling food or drink that goes directly to customers. At a lemonade stand where the product is prepared and handed over in close contact with the public, that gap matters.
The vomit and diarrhea cleanup procedures requirement exists for a specific reason. Norovirus, one of the most common causes of foodborne illness outbreaks, spreads through exactly those kinds of incidents. Without a written cleanup plan, workers may not know to use the right disinfectants, the right concentrations, or how to keep contaminated materials from spreading across a food prep surface. At a mobile vendor with limited space and equipment, a single mishandled incident could contaminate the entire operation.
The inspector provided documentation for both gaps during the visit. That means the vendor left the inspection with the materials. Whether those materials were read, understood, and put into practice is not something the inspection record can confirm.
The Longer Record
The inspection data available for Grandma Sheri Triple J'S Triple The Squeeze Lemonade & Sweets does not include a prior inspection count, which limits what can be said about the operation's history. This September 2026 visit appears in the record without a comparison point showing how many times state inspectors have previously reviewed the vendor.
What the record does show is that neither violation was marked as a repeat citation. That means inspectors did not find the same documented problems in a prior visit, or no prior visit produced a comparable citation for employee health knowledge or cleanup procedures.
The vendor passed the inspection. That outcome reflects the overall condition of the operation on September 10, not the specific knowledge gaps the inspector flagged.
Two violations at a mobile food vendor is a modest total. Many inspections of similar operations turn up more. But both violations here were priority foundation citations, not minor issues about a cracked container or a missing label. They pointed to the same underlying problem: the person running the stand was not prepared to answer basic regulatory questions about protecting the public from illness.
Where Things Stand
Neither violation was corrected on site in the traditional sense. The inspector supplied the missing documentation during the visit, which means the vendor received the materials but had not had them before the inspector arrived.
The inspection record does not indicate whether the person in charge completed any follow-up training, or whether the written cleanup procedures provided by the inspector were formally adopted by the operation. The vendor passed the inspection with those two violations on the books, both unresolved before the inspector knocked.
