SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL. State inspectors visiting Fire Wok at 85 Ava Way on July 24, 2026 found the restaurant was serving food from an unapproved or unknown source, a violation that means some of what customers ate that day had never passed through a USDA or FDA inspection checkpoint. Inspectors also cited five other high-severity violations on the same visit. The restaurant was not closed.

What Inspectors Found

1HIGHFood from unapproved or unknown sourcetraceability failure
2HIGHNo employee health policydisease transmission risk
3HIGHImproper hand and arm washing techniquetechnique failure
4HIGHInadequate shell stock identification/recordsshellfish traceability
5HIGHFood contact surfaces not properly cleaned/sanitizedcross-contamination risk
6HIGHTime as public health control not properly usedtime abuse violation
7INTMulti-use utensils not properly cleanedbiofilm risk
8INTSingle-use items improperly reusedcontamination risk

The unapproved food source violation sat alongside a citation for inadequate shell stock identification, meaning shellfish on hand, whether oysters, clams, or mussels, could not be traced back to a licensed harvester or processor. Shellfish are among the highest-risk foods a restaurant can serve, and without documentation linking them to an approved source, there is no chain of accountability if a customer becomes ill.

Inspectors also cited the restaurant for food contact surfaces that were not properly cleaned or sanitized. That means the cutting boards, prep tables, or other surfaces where raw ingredients are handled had not been adequately decontaminated between uses. On the same visit, inspectors found that time was not being used properly as a public health control, a citation that applies when a restaurant holds food in the temperature danger zone and relies on a tracked time limit rather than refrigeration to keep it safe. At Fire Wok, that tracking was not being done correctly.

The remaining high-severity citations covered two more direct transmission risks. Inspectors found no written employee health policy, which means there was no formal system requiring workers who are sick to stay out of the kitchen. They also cited improper hand and arm washing technique, meaning employees were going through the motions of washing hands without actually removing pathogens.

Two intermediate violations rounded out the inspection. Inspectors found multi-use utensils that had not been properly cleaned and single-use items being reused, a practice that introduces contamination risk from items that were never designed to withstand a second use.

What These Violations Mean

The unapproved food source violation is one of the most consequential a restaurant can receive, and it is rarely discussed in plain terms. When food enters a kitchen from an unverified supplier, it has skipped the inspection infrastructure that exists specifically to catch contamination before it reaches a plate. If a customer gets sick, investigators have no paper trail to follow. There is no lot number, no licensed processor, no harvest location. The illness may never be traced back to its origin. That is the core danger, and it is why state code treats this as a high-severity violation regardless of whether anyone got sick.

The employee health policy violation compounds the food sourcing problem. A written policy does more than remind workers to stay home when they feel ill. It creates a documented standard that a manager can enforce and that an inspector can verify. Without one, there is no barrier between a worker with Norovirus or Hepatitis A and the food they are preparing. Norovirus alone accounts for roughly 20 million illnesses in the United States each year, and food workers are a primary transmission route.

The improper handwashing technique citation at Fire Wok is more alarming than it might appear. A worker who washes hands incorrectly may believe the step has been completed. The pathogens remain. Combined with improperly sanitized food contact surfaces and reused single-use items, the July 24 inspection described a kitchen where contamination barriers had broken down across multiple points simultaneously.

The Longer Record

The July 24 inspection was not an anomaly. Fire Wok has 32 inspections on record and 240 total violations documented over the life of the facility. Six of those violations on the most recent inspection were high-severity, matching exactly the six high-severity violations inspectors found on January 29, 2026, just six months earlier.

The pattern extends further back. Inspectors cited four high-severity violations on September 24, 2025, and four more on January 30, 2025. The November 2024 inspections show a brief stretch with lower counts, but high-severity violations returned by the second visit in November of that year. The restaurant has never been emergency-closed in its inspection history.

That last fact is significant. A facility can accumulate high-severity violations across multiple consecutive inspections without triggering an emergency closure, as long as each visit ends with a callback inspection showing corrections. What the record at Fire Wok shows is not a single bad day. It shows a restaurant that has been cited for six high-severity violations twice in the same calendar year, with similar patterns in the years before that.

Still Open

As of the July 24, 2026 inspection, Fire Wok remained open to customers. The six high-severity violations documented that day, including food from an unapproved source and no mechanism to keep sick workers out of the kitchen, were not enough under state procedures to trigger an emergency closure order. The restaurant at 85 Ava Way was still serving food.