PORT CHARLOTTE, FL. State inspectors visiting Fin Sushi Port Charlotte on Peachland Boulevard on July 16 found food sourced from unapproved or unknown suppliers, a violation that means the restaurant was serving ingredients with no verifiable inspection trail, and no way to trace them if a customer got sick.

That was one of six high-severity violations documented during the visit. The restaurant was not closed.

What Inspectors Found

1HIGHFood from unapproved or unknown sourceNo inspection trail
2HIGHEmployee not reporting illness symptomsOutbreak risk
3HIGHImproper hand and arm washing techniquePathogen transfer
4HIGHFood contact surfaces not properly cleaned/sanitizedCross-contamination
5HIGHTime as public health control not properly usedTemperature danger zone
6HIGHNo consumer advisory for raw/undercooked foodsVulnerable customers uninformed
7INTMulti-use utensils not properly cleanedBiofilm risk

The illness-reporting failure is the kind of violation that precedes outbreaks. Inspectors found that employees were not reporting symptoms of illness as required, meaning a sick food handler could have been preparing raw fish and cooked dishes with no mechanism in place to stop them.

Alongside that, inspectors cited improper hand and arm washing technique. This is a distinct problem from simply skipping handwashing: a worker can go through the motions and still leave pathogens on their hands if the technique is wrong. At a sushi restaurant, where raw fish is handled throughout service, that distinction matters.

The food contact surfaces violation adds another layer. Cutting boards, prep surfaces, and any equipment that touches raw fish or ready-to-eat food can transfer bacteria directly to a customer's plate if they are not properly cleaned and sanitized between uses.

Inspectors also cited improper use of time as a public health control. At many sushi operations, time rather than temperature is used to track how long raw fish has been in the danger zone between 41 and 135 degrees. When that system is not followed correctly, there is no reliable way to know whether fish has been sitting too long to be safe.

The restaurant was also cited for having no consumer advisory posted for raw or undercooked foods. For a sushi restaurant, this is a baseline requirement: customers who are elderly, pregnant, or immunocompromised need that disclosure to make informed decisions about what they order. There was none.

The intermediate violation, improperly cleaned multi-use utensils, rounds out the list. Utensils that are not fully cleaned develop bacterial biofilms that resist standard sanitizing within 24 hours.

What These Violations Mean

The unapproved food source violation is the one that carries the broadest risk. When a restaurant sources food outside the regulated supply chain, inspectors and health officials have no way to trace that food back to a farm, processor, or distributor if customers become ill. At a sushi restaurant, where fish is frequently served raw, the absence of that traceability is acute. Pathogens including Listeria and Salmonella can be present in improperly handled raw fish with no visible sign of contamination.

The illness-reporting failure compounds that risk directly. Norovirus, one of the most common causes of foodborne illness outbreaks in restaurant settings, spreads readily from an infected food handler to customers through contaminated food. The reporting requirement exists precisely because infected workers often feel well enough to come in. Without a system that catches symptoms before a shift begins, the kitchen has no line of defense.

Together, the unapproved sourcing, the illness-reporting gap, and the improper handwashing technique create a sequence where contaminated food could enter the kitchen, be handled by a sick employee who did not wash properly, and reach a customer's plate on surfaces that were not adequately sanitized. Each violation is serious individually. In combination, they describe a kitchen with multiple simultaneous breakdowns in the controls designed to prevent exactly that sequence.

The Longer Record

The July 2026 inspection was not an outlier. State records show Fin Sushi Port Charlotte has been inspected 22 times and has accumulated 205 total violations across that history.

The pattern in the recent record is consistent. The September 2025 inspection also produced six high-severity violations and one intermediate, an identical severity profile to July 2026. The April 2025 inspection produced eight high-severity violations and three intermediate ones. The August 2024 inspection also produced eight high-severity violations.

Going back further, the April 2023 inspection logged five high-severity violations, and the December 2023 inspection logged three high-severity and four intermediate violations. There is no inspection in the recent record where the facility cleared high-severity violations entirely.

The restaurant has never been emergency-closed in its inspection history. That record stands alongside a violation count of 205 across 22 inspections, an average of more than nine violations per visit.

Still Open

State inspectors documented six high-severity violations at Fin Sushi Port Charlotte on July 16, 2026. The violations included food from an unknown source, employees not reporting illness symptoms, improper handwashing, unsanitized food contact surfaces, misuse of time as a public health control, and no advisory for raw fish.

The restaurant was not closed.