LEESBURG, FL. Food workers at Brick & Barrel on West Main Street were not reporting symptoms of illness to management during a May 1 inspection, state records show, and the restaurant had no written employee health policy in place to require them to do so.

Those two violations alone place every customer who ate there in a direct transmission pathway for Norovirus and other foodborne illness. Together, they appeared on a citation sheet that listed eight high-severity violations in a single visit.

The restaurant was not closed.

What Inspectors Found

1HIGHEmployee not reporting illness symptomsHigh severity
2HIGHNo employee health policyHigh severity
3HIGHFood not cooked to minimum temperatureHigh severity
4HIGHParasite destruction not followedHigh severity
5HIGHInadequate handwashing by employeesHigh severity
6HIGHToxic chemicals improperly stored or labeledHigh severity
7HIGHNo consumer advisory for raw/undercooked foodsHigh severity
8HIGHPerson in charge not present or not performing dutiesHigh severity
9INTImproper sewage or wastewater disposalIntermediate
10INTMulti-use utensils not properly cleanedIntermediate
11INTInadequate ventilation and lightingIntermediate

The inspector also cited the kitchen for not following parasite destruction procedures. That violation applies when a restaurant serves fish, pork, or wild game that has not been properly frozen or cooked to kill parasites including Anisakis and Trichinella. Without those steps, the parasites reach the customer's plate alive.

Food was not being cooked to required minimum temperatures. Salmonella in poultry survives below 165 degrees Fahrenheit. The citation does not specify which item or what temperature was measured, but the high-severity designation means the inspector treated it as an active risk, not a paperwork gap.

The facility had no consumer advisory posted for raw or undercooked menu items. That disclosure is the last line of protection for elderly customers, pregnant women, and anyone with a compromised immune system who might otherwise not know they are ordering something that carries pathogen risk.

Toxic chemicals were improperly stored or labeled somewhere in the facility. Inspectors also documented improper sewage or wastewater disposal, multi-use utensils that were not properly cleaned, and inadequate ventilation and lighting. The person in charge was either not present or not performing managerial duties when the inspector arrived.

Eleven violations total. The restaurant stayed open.

What These Violations Mean

The combination of no employee health policy and employees not reporting illness symptoms is not redundant. The policy creates the obligation; the reporting is the act. When both are absent at the same time, a worker who wakes up vomiting has no written rule telling them to stay home and no active practice of disclosing symptoms to a supervisor. Norovirus, which causes roughly 20 million illnesses in the United States each year, spreads most efficiently through exactly this scenario: an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic food handler who prepares or handles food without anyone knowing they are sick.

Inadequate handwashing compounds that risk directly. Hands are the transfer mechanism. A sick employee who also is not washing hands properly creates a contamination pathway that touches every surface and every plate they handle during a shift.

The parasite destruction and undercooking violations belong in a separate category of concern. They are not about hygiene habits or management oversight; they are about whether the cooking process itself is eliminating biological hazards in the food. When both appear in the same inspection, it suggests the kitchen may not have reliable protocols for either fish preparation or general cooking temperatures.

Improperly stored or labeled toxic chemicals near a food operation create a poisoning risk that is distinct from microbial illness. Mislabeled containers can be mistaken for food-safe products. Chemicals stored near food surfaces can contaminate ingredients without anyone noticing until a customer becomes acutely ill.

The Longer Record

The May 1 inspection was not an anomaly. State records show Brick & Barrel has accumulated 221 violations across 36 inspections on record, a figure that works out to an average of more than six violations per visit.

The pattern in the most recent inspections is consistent. The December 2025 visit produced four high-severity violations. The October 2025 visit produced seven high-severity and three intermediate violations, a nearly identical profile to the May 1 inspection. The August 2024 visit also produced eight high-severity violations, matching the current count exactly.

Going back further, the September 2023 inspection found six high-severity violations. The December 2024 inspection found seven. There is no inspection in the recent record that shows a sustained period of improvement followed by a regression. The high violation counts have been recurring for at least two and a half years.

The facility has never been emergency-closed.

The Pattern

Eight high-severity violations in a single inspection is a number that, at other Florida restaurants, has triggered emergency closure orders. The state's emergency closure authority exists precisely for situations where inspectors determine a facility poses an immediate threat to public health.

At Brick & Barrel, a restaurant that has now recorded eight high-severity violations in at least two separate inspections, plus seven in two others, the doors stayed open on May 1.

Customers who visited that evening had no way of knowing that the person responsible for overseeing the kitchen was not performing their duties, that employees were not required by written policy to report illness, and that food was not reaching safe cooking temperatures.

The restaurant remained open.