FLORIDA. State inspectors cited the Chick-fil-A at 326 SE 1st Ave in Florida City with seven high-severity violations between July and October 2026, the worst performance of any Chick-fil-A location in Florida during that stretch, and a record that touches nearly every category of acute food safety risk.

The Florida City location had no written employee health policy in place. Inspectors also found that employees were not reporting illness symptoms, that handwashing technique was improper, and that the person in charge was either absent or not performing managerial duties. On top of those four violations, inspectors cited inadequate shell stock identification records, food in poor condition, no consumer advisory for raw or undercooked foods, and improper sewage or wastewater disposal.

That is nine violations at a single location, seven of them high-severity, in a 90-day window.

The Violations

1HIGHChick-fil-A Florida City7 high, 2 intermediate
2HIGHChick-fil-A Kissimmee (W Irlo Bronson)5 high, 0 intermediate
3HIGHChick-fil-A Jacksonville (Lunar Dr)5 high, 1 intermediate
4HIGHChick-fil-A Winter Garden4 high, 2 intermediate
5HIGHChick-fil-A Sand Lake Rd, Orlando4 high, 1 intermediate
6HIGHChick-fil-A Sanford FSR 038004 high, 3 intermediate
7HIGHChick-fil-A Fleming Island4 high, 1 intermediate
8MEDChick-fil-A 04625, Orlando (McKenna Dr)4 high, 2 intermediate
9MEDChick-fil-A Mandarin, Jacksonville4 high, 1 intermediate
10MEDChick-fil-A Doral FSR3 high, 1 intermediate

The Chick-fil-A at 6050 W Irlo Bronson Memorial Highway in Kissimmee drew five high-severity violations, including food from an unapproved or unknown source, food contact surfaces not properly cleaned or sanitized, food not cooked to the required minimum temperature, and toxic substances improperly stored. That combination, an unverified food source, undercooking, and contaminated surfaces, covers three of the most direct routes to a foodborne illness outbreak.

The Chick-fil-A at 14020 Lunar Dr in Jacksonville also drew five high-severity violations, among them toxic chemicals improperly stored or labeled and no allergen awareness demonstrated by staff. Inspectors added a citation for inadequate shell stock identification records, the same shellfish traceability violation that appeared at four other locations in this same 90-day period.

Chick-fil-A #01918 at 3166 Daniels Rd in Winter Garden was cited for employees not reporting illness symptoms, parasite destruction procedures not followed, no consumer advisory for raw or undercooked foods, and improperly stored or labeled toxic chemicals. The parasite destruction violation, also cited at the Sand Lake Road location in Orlando, is not a paperwork issue. It means the facility cannot demonstrate that fish or other parasite-risk proteins were frozen or cooked to the temperatures required to kill organisms like Anisakis or Trichinella.

The Chick-fil-A at 7333 W Sand Lake Rd in Orlando drew the same parasite destruction citation alongside inadequate shell stock records, no consumer advisory, and improperly stored toxic substances, plus an intermediate violation for sewage or wastewater disposal.

Chick-fil-A FSR 03800 at 4590 W State Road 46 in Sanford accumulated the most intermediate violations of any location in this period, three, including improperly cleaned multi-use utensils and inadequate ventilation, alongside four high-severity citations for toxic chemicals, allergen awareness, and food contact surfaces.

The Chick-fil-A at 1541 County Rd 220 in Fleming Island was cited for improper handwashing technique, no allergen awareness, improperly stored chemicals, no consumer advisory, and improper sewage disposal.

Chick-fil-A 04625 at 9500 McKenna Dr in Orlando drew a citation for food from an unapproved or unknown source, the same violation found at the Kissimmee location, along with food contact surfaces not properly sanitized, no consumer advisory, no allergen awareness, and inadequate cooling or cold-holding equipment.

Chick-fil-A Mandarin at 3280 Oak Bluff Ln in Jacksonville was cited for no person in charge performing duties and employees not reporting illness symptoms, the same management failure cluster that appeared at the Florida City location. Inspectors also found food contact surfaces not properly cleaned and no consumer advisory posted.

Chick-fil-A Doral FSR at 9815 NW 41st St drew three high-severity violations, including both toxic chemicals improperly stored and toxic substances improperly identified, plus an intermediate for sewage disposal.

What These Violations Mean

The most frequently cited high-severity violation across these ten locations was the absence of a consumer advisory for raw or undercooked foods, appearing at six of the ten. That violation is not a technicality. Without a posted advisory, customers who are pregnant, elderly, immunocompromised, or managing chronic illness have no way to make an informed choice about menu items that carry elevated pathogen risk. The Florida City location compounded that failure with no employee health policy at all, meaning the facility had no written mechanism to keep sick workers away from food.

The employee illness reporting failure at Florida City, Winter Garden, and Chick-fil-A Mandarin in Jacksonville is among the most direct outbreak risks in food service. Norovirus, the leading cause of foodborne illness in the United States, spreads through the fecal-oral route. A single infected food worker who continues handling food without reporting symptoms can expose dozens or hundreds of customers before any illness is detected.

Toxic chemical violations appeared at seven of the ten locations, in one form or another. At the Sanford and Doral locations, inspectors cited both improperly stored chemicals and improperly identified toxic substances in the same inspection. Chemicals stored near food or mislabeled as food products are not a theoretical risk. Acute poisoning from cleaning agents or sanitizers can occur within minutes of ingestion and is not always immediately recognized as a food safety event.

Inadequate shell stock identification records appeared at four locations: Florida City, Kissimmee, Jacksonville on Lunar Drive, and Sand Lake Road in Orlando. Chick-fil-A is not a seafood restaurant in the traditional sense, which makes this violation pattern notable. Without proper shellfish tags and receiving records, there is no chain of traceability if a customer becomes ill from a shellfish-containing item. Regulators cannot trace the product back to the harvest bed, and the investigation stalls.

The Longer Record

Statewide, Chick-fil-A's 216 Florida locations have accumulated 4,076 inspections on record, an average of roughly 19 inspections per location. The chain's overall pass rate of 95.83 percent and average of 3.42 violations per inspection are both within the range of what regulators and industry observers consider acceptable for a large quick-service operation. No Florida Chick-fil-A location has been emergency-closed this year.

That context matters, but it does not dissolve what the 90-day record shows. Nine locations accumulated high-severity violations in the same quarter, and the violations were not random. They clustered around the same categories: chemical storage, allergen awareness, consumer advisories, and illness reporting. That is a pattern across geography, not a single location with a bad month.

The Florida City location's seven high-severity violations in a single inspection period stands out regardless of the chain's broader numbers. Seven high-severity citations in one visit, covering management presence, employee illness policy, handwashing, food condition, shellfish records, consumer advisories, and sewage, is not a collection of paperwork gaps. It is a near-complete breakdown of the control systems that are supposed to prevent a foodborne illness event.

The Kissimmee and McKenna Drive Orlando locations each drew a citation for food from an unapproved or unknown source, a violation that state records show is relatively uncommon at chain locations with centralized supply systems. That it appeared at two Chick-fil-A locations in the same 90-day window, in different markets, has not been publicly explained.