JENSEN BEACH, FL. Inspectors walked into Umiya Florida on NW Federal Highway on August 17 and found food sourced from unapproved or unknown suppliers, employees not reporting illness symptoms, and handwashing facilities inspectors deemed inadequate. The restaurant collected 9 high-severity violations and 4 intermediate violations that day. It was never ordered to close.

What Inspectors Found

1HIGHFood from unapproved or unknown sourceHigh severity
2HIGHEmployee not reporting symptoms of illnessHigh severity
3HIGHInadequate handwashing facilitiesHigh severity
4HIGHImproper hand and arm washing techniqueHigh severity
5HIGHInadequate shell stock identification/recordsHigh severity
6HIGHFood contact surfaces not properly cleaned/sanitizedHigh severity
7HIGHTime as a public health control not properly usedHigh severity
8HIGHNo consumer advisory for raw/undercooked foodsHigh severity
9HIGHPerson in charge not present or not performing dutiesHigh severity
10INTMulti-use utensils not properly cleanedIntermediate
11INTSingle-use items improperly reusedIntermediate
12INTImproper use of wiping clothsIntermediate
13INTInadequate or improperly maintained toilet facilitiesIntermediate

The food sourcing violation is among the most serious in the inspection record. Inspectors cited food from unapproved or unknown sources, meaning some ingredients on hand could not be traced back to a supplier that meets USDA or FDA safety standards. If a customer later became ill, investigators would have no chain of custody to follow.

The shell stock identification violation compounds that problem. Shellfish, including oysters, clams, and mussels, are consumed raw or lightly cooked and carry an elevated risk of Vibrio and norovirus contamination. Without proper tags and records, there is no way to trace a batch back to its harvest location if an illness is reported.

Inspectors also cited employees for not reporting illness symptoms, a violation that sits alongside the food sourcing citation as one of the most direct threats to customers. The restaurant additionally had inadequate handwashing facilities and documented improper hand and arm washing technique. Both violations were cited on the same visit, meaning the infrastructure for hand hygiene was broken and the technique used at the available facilities was also wrong.

The person in charge was not present or not performing duties. CDC data shows establishments without active managerial control accumulate critical violations at roughly three times the rate of those with engaged oversight. The remaining high-severity violations included food contact surfaces not properly cleaned or sanitized, time as a public health control not properly used, and no consumer advisory posted for raw or undercooked menu items.

What These Violations Mean

The combination of unapproved food sources and missing shellfish traceability records is not a paperwork problem. It means that if a customer at Umiya Florida became sick after eating shellfish in August, health investigators would have no harvest records to pull, no supplier to contact, and no way to determine whether other restaurants received product from the same batch.

The illness reporting violation is a direct transmission risk. Food workers who handle ingredients while symptomatic for norovirus, Salmonella, or Hepatitis A are the documented cause of the largest food service outbreaks on record. A single infected employee working a full shift can expose dozens of customers before anyone recognizes what is happening.

The handwashing failures documented here are not redundant with each other. Inadequate facilities means the physical infrastructure, soap, running water, accessible sinks, was found deficient. Improper technique means that even when employees did wash, the method was insufficient to remove pathogens. Both conditions were present at the same time.

The time-as-public-health-control violation means food was being held in the temperature danger zone, between 41 and 135 degrees, without proper documentation or adherence to the time limits that substitute for refrigeration. Bacterial counts in that range can double every 20 minutes.

The Longer Record

Umiya Florida has four inspections on record. The August 17 inspection is by far the worst. The facility's three other inspections, on July 23, August 18, and August 25, produced a combined three high-severity violations and no intermediate violations. The August 17 visit stands apart.

The August 18 callback inspection, the day after the 9-violation visit, found three high-severity violations still present. The August 25 follow-up showed zero high-severity and zero intermediate violations, suggesting the restaurant addressed the outstanding issues within the week.

The facility has never been emergency-closed in its inspection history. With only four inspections on record, there is not enough history to establish a long-term pattern of repeat violations in specific categories. What the record does show is that on a single day in August, a restaurant with an otherwise thin file accumulated more high-severity violations than most facilities collect across years of inspections.

Open for Business

State inspectors documented 9 high-severity violations at Umiya Florida on August 17, including food from unverifiable sources, employees not reporting illness, broken handwashing infrastructure, and no consumer advisory for raw items on the menu.

The restaurant was not ordered to close.

Customers who ate at Umiya Florida on or around August 17 had no way of knowing that the food on their plates could not be traced to an approved supplier, that the employees who prepared it were not required to disclose illness symptoms, or that the handwashing stations inspectors examined that day were found inadequate.

The restaurant passed its August 25 inspection. The August 17 record remains.